Concession-making in Multi-bilateral Negotiations and Multi-attribute Auctions

نویسندگان

  • Gregory E. Kersten
  • Dmitry Gimon
چکیده

Reverse auctions and negotiations are two common procurement mechanisms. The drawback of many auctions is their sole focus on price. The drawback of negotiations is that they are sequential, slow and costly. Internet enables multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral multi-attribute negotiations efficiently. In both processes concession-making plays a key role. The paper presents typology of concessions, which has been empirically verified. The results show that: (1) bidders and negotiators use all types of permissible concessions; (2) bidders make more concessions in auctions than in negotiations; and (3) use of singleand multipleattribute concessions differs between auctions and negotiations. The results also show that buyers obtain the highest profit through auctions, then competitive negotiations and the lowest through cooperative negotiations. The reverse is true for the sellers.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Behavioral Study of Concession-making: Multi-attribute Auctions vs. Multi-bilateral Negotiations

Concession-making behavior is an essential process in negotiations and auctions and has a critical impact on the outcomes of an exchange. In auctions, concessions relate to deciding on the next bid by bid-makers, while in negotiations they involve proposing next offers by both parties. The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate concession-making by parties in multi-attribute auctio...

متن کامل

A Comparative Study of Multi-Attribute Continuous Double Auction Mechanisms

Auctions have been as a competitive method of buying and selling valuable or rare items for a long time. Single-sided auctions in which participants negotiate on a single attribute (e.g. price) are very popular. Double auctions and negotiation on multiple attributes create more advantages compared to single-sided and single-attribute auctions. Nonetheless, this adds the complexity of the auctio...

متن کامل

Negotiation and Auction Mechanisms in E-procurement: Systems and Experiments

Auctions and negotiations are mechanisms used in market exchanges. Behavioral economics experiments focused on the mechanism efficiency which required highly simplified problems and contexts. This paper discusses an on-going project involving an experimental comparison of auction and negotiation mechanisms embedded in software which we have developed. The experiments are situated in an e-busine...

متن کامل

Auctions and Negotiations are Comparable , Aren ’ t They ?

Comparative studies of auction and negotiation exchange mechanisms are inconclusive. These studies have typically compared outcomes obtained from the two mechanisms. The question which this paper aims to address is the viability of outcome-based comparisons. Such comparisons assume that both mechanisms produce the same types of outcomes but their values differ. An argument can be made that this...

متن کامل

Auction and Negotiation Mechanisms for Multi-Attribute E-Procurement Transactions

This study focuses on mechanism design in order to solve multi-attribute e-procurement problems. In particularly, this study addresses two realistic requirements in mechanism design: (1) specifications of request/proposal on multiple attributes, and (2) incentive compatibility on information exchange/disclosure. Taking into account the needs and emergence of advanced mechanisms in eprocurement,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013